Legislature(1993 - 1994)
03/25/1993 05:12 PM Senate O&G
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON OIL & GAS March 25, 1993 5:12 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT Senator Loren Leman, Chairman Senator Judith Salo MEMBERS ABSENT Senator Rick Halford Senator Bert Sharp Senator Al Adams COMMITTEE CALENDAR Group Insurance Pooling WITNESS REGISTER Larry Eppenbach Legislative Research Agency 130 Seward St. Suite 218 Juneau, Alaska 99801-2196 POSITION STATEMENT: Commented on Group Insurance Pooling. Ray Gillespie Association of Refined Fuel Distributors 9478 Riverbend Court Juneau, Alaska 99801 POSITION STATEMENT: Commented on Direct Action Insurance. James Cantor, Assistant Attorney General Department of Law 1031 W. 4th, Suite 200 Anchorage, Alaska 99501-1994 POSITION STATEMENT: Commented on Direct Action Insurance. ACTION NARRATIVE TAPE 93-11, SIDE A Number 001 SENATOR LEMAN called the Special Committee on Oil and Gas meeting to order at 5:12 p.m. and announced they would discuss group insurance pooling. LARRY EPPENBACH, Legislative Research, said his report grew out of SB 405 from last year which was remedial in nature. It solved the open ended liability insurance companies faced with uncertain coverage amounts that could have exceeded their policies. SB 405 limited the policy amounts. The Section of SB 405 addressed to non-crude operators waived a requirement for non-crude operators to pay for financial responsibility with insurance with a direct action clause. The major findings in this report say that state or private pooling isn't likely to create a competitive insurance product, because there are not that many non-crude operators. There are about 72 in the state and 9 of those are exempt (because they're part of the federal government), 29 are quite large and self insure or are guaranteed by others. Thirty one of them purchase insurance. Six of those have insurance that successfully contains a direct action clause. The other 25 have been granted waivers by the DEC. The most attractive alternative is for a private insurance product to be developed that would have a direct action clause. There are two ways that could occur, MR. EPPENBACH said. One, the clause could be directly in the insurance, and two, an umbrella policy could be written that provided direct action in addition to other insurance the operator might possess. Therefore, the package of the two might meet all the requirements. Number 177 SENATOR LEMAN asked if the direct action clause would be secondary to the other insurance. MR. EPPENBACK answered almost certainly. MR. CANTOR said some private entities are working to put together a package with Lloyd's of London that will solve Alaska's problems. MR. EPPENBACH commented that it looked a lot like private insurance would be solving the insurance problem in the very immediate future and the delay suggested in the report was not unreasonable. Number 244 RAY GILLESPIE, representing three refined product distributors, said direct action insurance has been consistently unavailable since the Exxon-Valdez incident. He said right now the companies have an indemnification policy underwritten by Lloyd's of London, which says if there is a judgement rendered against the company, they will come in and pay the judgement. Lloyd's of London has never agreed to be sued in any court in the United States. MR. GILLESPIE said that the direct action requirement for companies like the ones he represents is superfluous, because they have strong ties in Alaska and have assets large enough to cover any spill. He noted that California, Florida, Washington, and Virginia have dropped their direct action requirement. These states have in law a requirement for a bond. The bond is waived if the company meets certain conditions - that is substantial assets and a history of connections with the state. Number 323 SENATOR SALO asked what our history was on lawsuits over direct action issues. MR. GILLESPIE said there had been maybe one at the most. SENATOR SALO said she understood that Lloyd's of London was having financial difficulties and asked if that would affect their ability to write insurance for direct action. MR. CANTOR explained that one part of Lloyd's was in trouble and possibly the Exxon Valdez incident was making it difficult to purchase this type of insurance. Number 355 SENATOR LEMAN asked why other states were dropping the direct action provision. MR. CANTOR said that the realities of the insurance market have caused the other states to change their financial responsibility requirements. SENATOR LEMAN thanked everyone for their participation and adjourned the meeting at 5:40 p.m.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|